More realistic plasmoid simulation confirms net energy production


Share
Posted by Admin on Jun 25, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Tools: Print | | chat (6) Comments

An improved computer simulation of a plasmoid, the dense region where focus fusion energy generation takes place, has confirmed that net energy production is feasible, and in fact has shown higher energy production than previous, less realistic, simulations.

In the latest simulations, energy output from the plasmoid in the form of x-rays and an ion beam exceed energy input by as much as a factor of 2.0, significantly more than the factor of 1.6 generated in previous simulations. The fact that the more realistic simulations actually improve results is very encouraging for the success of the project.

The plasmoid simulations have been one of the main scientific efforts of LPP President Eric Lerner over the past nine months. There have been a number of major improvements on the previous simulations. First, the model now contains collective heating mechanisms.  These collective heating modes occur when high energy particles move thorough a plasma, creating plasma waves, like the wake of a speed boat. The waves then heat the electrons in the plasma. This is addition to the normal particle-to-particle heating caused by collisions among individual ions and electrons.

A second and more important change in the simulation is in the treatment of the density of the plasmoid when compression ends. This density is determined by a balance with the magnetic field energy. In essence, as density and magnetic field both increase, at a certain point the electron frequency in spiraling in the magnetic field is faster than the electron frequency vibrating in the plasma. In technical terms, the synchrotron frequency exceeds the plasma frequency. This briefly allows radiation to escape, triggering a sharp local fall in magnetic energy, the generation of an enormous electric field, and the initiation of the ion and electron beams that start heating up the plasmoid.

The new simulation uses more sophisticated physical corrections in determining this balance, and thereby shows that higher plasma densities will be obtained for a given magnetic field. This in turn leads to a faster and more thorough fusion burn and thus higher energy yield.

In one simulation run, with the maximum magnetic field at 13 GG (billion gauss) x-ray energy emitted was 90% of input energy and beam energy was 94%, for a total energy multiplication factor of 1.84. In a second run, with a maximum magnetic field of 15 GG, x-ray energy was 122% of input energy and beam energy was 77% for a total energy multiplication factor of 1.99. With these energy multiplication factors, using reasonable energy conversion efficiencies, net power production will certainly be feasible.

These results are being prepared for publication.

Lerner is continuing work on the simulation, developing it into a multi-layer model that will begin to reflect variations of conditions within different parts of the plasmoid.  Eventually, a full three-D simulation will be generated using the powerful drift kinetic fluid particle technique under development by LPP collaborator Robert Terry.


Your involvement makes a big difference! Join online, or send checks payable to Focus Fusion Society, PO Box 232, South Bound Brook, NJ 08880.

Comments

For a more in depth discussion, start a thread in the forums.
There are (6) comments.



DerekShannon's avatar

Yay!


Nice to hear this good news. What are the parameters of a pilot-plant fusion reactor?
How much would such a pilot plant cost to build and operate? How long would it take to build it? How many people (researchers and technicians) will be needed to manage and operate such a plant? Questions such as these must be addressed before fusion power can become a reality.


Great news!

May I suggest that one way of spreading the word on Focus Fusion would be to make available software to enable plasma focus simulations on desktop PCs. This could perhaps be achieved by utilising the massive parallelism in off-the-shelf PC graphics cards, which are now commonplace (being a basic requirement for Windows Vista).

Instead of just using the GPU to render 3D images, the plasma simulation could actually be run on the GPU in real-time. Such simulations are already being done, NVidia has created computational fluid dynamics simulators using just this technique.


DerekShannon's avatar

Good idea, Alex—I think that’s definitely worthy of a full forum discussion that could address the various issues.  I don’t actually know that the simulation has a graphical output, for instance, and there might be a need to wait for the patent to be allowed.  But if you have some skills in this area, let’s put ‘em to work!

And Rashidas, the short answers to your questions regarding cost and personnel are “not much” and “not many.”  It sounds like you might enjoy reading the Lawrenceville Plasma Physics business plan, available here.

Now here’s hoping for good news soon on that new switch doo-hickey down in Chile!


Transmute's avatar

I’ve been running Folding@Home for years now, I wouldn’t mind replacing it with “Fusion@home” for awhile.


maihem's avatar

Such a tool, once ready for a casual user base and announced on slashdot and freshmeat, could be a big marketing hit.


Post a Comment

Log In to comment.
Not a member? Register.

Notify me of follow-up comments?
The world needs fusion.
Fusion needs you!


Do Stuff!
Join!

or send checks payable to:
Focus Fusion Society
PO Box 232
South Bound Brook, NJ 08880


Join:
forums
twitter
facebook
rss feed
flickr
donate
Youtube
zotero
Focus Fusion Society on LinkedIn
google