IEC - POPS
Posted: 16 August 2010 12:27 AM   [ Ignore ]
Old Croaker
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1395
Joined  2007-11-01

That’s “Periodically Oscillating Plasma Sphere”, a variant on the Bussard IEC scheme.  In a nutshell, pumping the ion cloud at the core of a chamber with RF timed to its natural resonance permits much higher compression and energy recovery.
http://www.lanl.gov/p/rh_pp_park.shtml

I can’t find a specific date for the above post, but the fine print at the bottom says C. 2009-2010, so I assume it’s pretty current.


The envisaged final ‘rig’ looks pretty complex: “Such a device would contain thousands of tiny spherical IEC reactors within a single reactor vessel to produce a large amount of fusion power (i.e., ~ 100–1000 MW).”  See image below. I assume power generation would be standard Carnot steam cycle stuff, using the heat extracted via the pipe vents near the top. (?)

Could be that the “tiny” part is the key; confinement and containment like FF’s, without walls made of unobtainium.  But it’s not clear to me from the text whether the fuel is DD or DT, and whether the reactor vessel is filled with water (heavy water?) moderator surrounding the reactors, etc.

Image Attachments
penning Trap Modulator IEC POPS.gif
 Signature 

Help Keep The Planet Green: Maximize Your CO2 and CH4 Output!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2010 05:10 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  219
Joined  2006-09-20

Just look at the names involved! It’s our Murali Subramanian, and Polywell’s Rick Nebel. And I think J. Park is also with Polywell.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2010 02:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Old Croaker
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1395
Joined  2007-11-01
Henning - 16 August 2010 09:10 AM

Just look at the names involved! It’s our Murali Subramanian, and Polywell’s Rick Nebel. And I think J. Park is also with Polywell.

Good catch!  I wonder if we could get Murali’s take on it, and how he stacks it up against FF for potential and timeline.

Y’know, it strikes me that the label/name of the process is kinda redundant. I mean, “oscillating” pretty much has to be “periodic”, doesn’t it?  Unless, of course, it was “occasional”.  Then we’d have “Occasionally Oscillating Plasma Sphere”, or OOPS!  wink  LOL

 Signature 

Help Keep The Planet Green: Maximize Your CO2 and CH4 Output!

Profile