<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    
    <channel>
    
    <title>Focus Fusion Society Forum</title>
    <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/</link>
    <description>Focus Fusion Society Forum</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2011</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2011-11-23T18:00:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree.</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1033/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1033/#When:18:07:14Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;  / Albert Einstein /&lt;br /&gt;
How is it possible to understand this quote? &lt;br /&gt;
What is the name of  Einstein’s tree?&lt;br /&gt;
The name of  Einstein’s tree is Vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
 What is the vacuum? &lt;br /&gt;
The answer.&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
‘It might even give us some ground to speculate that &lt;br /&gt;
the vacuum itself (and hence the universe) is ‘conscious’.&lt;br /&gt;
/ Book  ‘The quantum self ’ page 208.&amp;nbsp; by Danah Zohar. /&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
 ‘If we were looking for something that we could conceive &lt;br /&gt;
of as God within the universe of the new physics, this ground&lt;br /&gt;
 state, coherent quantum vacuum might be a good place to start.’&lt;br /&gt;
/ Book  ‘The quantum self ’ page 208.&amp;nbsp; by Danah Zohar. /&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusfusion.org/index.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDanah_Zohar&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danah_Zohar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Danah Zohar  arguments are following.&lt;br /&gt;
1&lt;br /&gt;
The vacuum is the basic, fundamental and underlying reality &lt;br /&gt;
of which everything in the universe – including ourselves – is&lt;br /&gt;
 an expression.&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
Vacuum is not empty. Vaccum full with  virtual antiparticles.&lt;br /&gt;
These virtual energy antiparticles in potential conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
But after energy fluctuations they appear as a real particles.&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
Consciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
The consciousness can be in a coherent Frohlich&#45;style &lt;br /&gt;
Bose &#45; Einstein condensate condition. &lt;br /&gt;
The Vacuum state is in the state of coherent Bose &#45; Einstein &lt;br /&gt;
condensate condition.&lt;br /&gt;
And Danah Zohar wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
‘ Futher, excitations ( fluctuations) of this coherent vacuum  &lt;br /&gt;
condensate appear to have the same mathematics as the&lt;br /&gt;
 excitations of our own, Frohlich&#45;style Bose &#45; Einstein condensate.&lt;br /&gt;
Understanding this might well lead us to conclude that the physics&lt;br /&gt;
 which gives us human consciousness is one of the basic &lt;br /&gt;
potentialities within the quantum vacuum, the fundament of all reality.’&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;   / Book  ‘The quantum self ’ page 208. / &lt;br /&gt;
==.&lt;br /&gt;
 About vacuum  Paul Dirac wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
 is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly &lt;br /&gt;
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description &lt;br /&gt;
of something more complex? ‘&lt;br /&gt;
We don’t know what vacuum is and therefore we are ignorant people. &lt;br /&gt;
And as an ignorant people we will surprised and laugh reading that the&lt;br /&gt;
 Physical  Energy Vacuum can take the functions of God. &lt;br /&gt;
=====.&lt;br /&gt;
Best wishes.&lt;br /&gt;
 Israel Sadovnik Socratus &lt;br /&gt;
=====================..&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-11-20T18:07:14+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Bible’s stories.</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1018/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1018/#When:14:19:47Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Bible’s stories.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Old Bible story:&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;He&#8230;hanged the Earth upon nothing.&#8221; / Job 26:7 /&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;New Bible story:&lt;br /&gt;
According to the many scientific experts however,&lt;br /&gt;
space didn&#8217;t exist prior to the Big Bang.&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to say,&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;He&#8230;hanged the Big Bang upon nothing.&#8221;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
==.&lt;br /&gt;
Isn’t  this situation strange?&lt;br /&gt;
But if we think that ‘nothing’ is a Reference Frame &lt;br /&gt;
( for example – Vacuum) then the situation will be more practicable. &lt;br /&gt;
=====.&lt;br /&gt;
Socratus.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-11-05T14:19:47+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>We are surrounded by  Duality.</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1014/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1014/#When:05:38:27Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We are surrounded by  Duality.&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
A central concept of Quantum Theory is wave–particle duality.&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
The Universe as whole is Two &#45; Measured World:&lt;br /&gt;
one Reference Frame is the Matter World&lt;br /&gt;
and another Reference Frame  is the  Vacuum World.&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to say that we are surrounded by Double Universe.&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
Our brain works on dualistic basis:&lt;br /&gt;
usually as a logical consciousness and &lt;br /&gt;
rarely as an unconsciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
It means the interaction between billions and billions neurons&lt;br /&gt;
 can be in two states: &lt;br /&gt;
a) In the state of consciousness ( C) &lt;br /&gt;
b)or in the state of unconsciousness ( U).&lt;br /&gt;
The question is:&lt;br /&gt;
How can the information ( or quantum of information ) transfer &lt;br /&gt;
( or be transferred) from the state C to the state U and vice versa ?&lt;br /&gt;
Isn’t  this question similar to the puzzle of quantum tunneling ?&lt;br /&gt;
=.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion:&lt;br /&gt;
The elementary particles, the Universe, the brain –&lt;br /&gt;
all they have dualistic basis. &lt;br /&gt;
And until now the dualistic phenomena has no solution.&lt;br /&gt;
===.&lt;br /&gt;
P.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of &lt;br /&gt;
consciousness must provide the basis of an improved &lt;br /&gt;
understanding of quantum mechanics.&#8221; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp;  / Evan Walker / &lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
‘ The old philosophical question:&lt;br /&gt;
Does only the brain create Consciousness ?&lt;br /&gt;
Some scientists are not sure .’&lt;br /&gt;
/ Book ‘The Holographic Universe.’ by Michael Talbot. /&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
 Daniel Shechtman who won the 2011 Nobel Prize&lt;br /&gt;
 in chemistry for quasi crystals, having spent much of his &lt;br /&gt;
career being vilified and exiled as a crank &lt;br /&gt;
“I was thrown out of my research group. &lt;br /&gt;
They said I brought shame on them with what I was saying.”&lt;br /&gt;
===.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.&lt;br /&gt;
=====.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-11-04T05:38:27+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Double Universe.</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1006/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1006/#When:18:36:17Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Double Universe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Universe as whole is Two &#45; Measured World.&lt;br /&gt;
Why ?&lt;br /&gt;
Because :&lt;br /&gt;
‘ Somehow, the energy is extracted from the vacuum and turned&lt;br /&gt;
 into particles&#8230;Don&#8217;t try it in your basement, but you can do it.’&lt;br /&gt;
 /&#8212;University of Chicago cosmologist Rocky Kolb /&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#8217; Somehow&#8217;&amp;nbsp; from &#8217; Somewhere&#8217;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
From &#8217; Somewhere&#8217; , &#8217; Somehow&#8217;&amp;nbsp; to the Visual World.&lt;br /&gt;
We have Double Universe.&lt;br /&gt;
=.&lt;br /&gt;
a)&lt;br /&gt;
If you want you can call one Reference Frame as &lt;br /&gt;
Schwarzschild radius ( a radius where the escape velocity&lt;br /&gt;
 would be so high, that not even light could escape –&amp;nbsp; black hole)&lt;br /&gt;
And another Reference Frame is outside of Schwarzschild radius.&lt;br /&gt;
b)&lt;br /&gt;
If you want you can call one Reference Frame as ‘Dirac sea’.&lt;br /&gt;
And another Reference Frame is outside of ‘Dirac sea’&lt;br /&gt;
c)&lt;br /&gt;
If you want you can call one Reference Frame as ‘ Kirchhoff black body’&lt;br /&gt;
And another Reference Frame is outside of ‘ Kirchhoff black body’. &lt;br /&gt;
/ Max Laue called ‘ Kirchhoff black body’ as  ‘ Kirchhoff vacuum’ /&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But to understand the Existence we must think about the &lt;br /&gt;
Double Universe, where one Reference Frame is the Matter World&lt;br /&gt;
and another Reference Frame  is the  Vacuum World.&lt;br /&gt;
But today physicists know the Matter world and refuse to think &lt;br /&gt;
about the Vacuum world. &lt;br /&gt;
====.&lt;br /&gt;
===.&lt;br /&gt;
Best wishes.&lt;br /&gt;
 Israel Sadovnik Socratus &lt;br /&gt;
=====================.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-10-14T18:36:17+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Source of Consciousness</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1004/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1004/#When:07:56:33Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Source of Consciousness&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does evolution begin on big bang  level?&lt;br /&gt;
Does evolution begin on the quarks level?&lt;br /&gt;
In our earthly world there is only one fundamental&lt;br /&gt;
 particle &#45;&amp;nbsp; electron&lt;br /&gt;
Does evolution begin on the electron’s  level?&lt;br /&gt;
Can an electron evolve?&lt;br /&gt;
Does an electron have consciousness ?&lt;br /&gt;
Energy is electromagnetic waves (em):&amp;nbsp; E=h*f&lt;br /&gt;
Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron &lt;br /&gt;
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron &lt;br /&gt;
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality &lt;br /&gt;
Can evolution of life begin on electron’s level? &lt;br /&gt;
=.&lt;br /&gt;
Molecular biology &amp;amp; molecular evolution&lt;br /&gt;
Cosmology &amp;amp; cosmic evolution&lt;br /&gt;
If Universe evolve can electron evolve too ?&lt;br /&gt;
Does evolution of life begin on electron level ? &lt;br /&gt;
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe&lt;br /&gt;
Electron takes important part in this work&lt;br /&gt;
Question:&lt;br /&gt;
Why does the simplest particle &#45; electron have six formulas: &lt;br /&gt;
E=h*f &amp;nbsp; e = +ah*c &amp;nbsp; e = &#45;ah*c &amp;nbsp; +E=Mc^2 &amp;nbsp; &#45;E=Mc^2  E= ∞ ?&lt;br /&gt;
Nobody knows&lt;br /&gt;
Question:&lt;br /&gt;
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ? &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;   a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;   b) Maxwell’s equations &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;   c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;   d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;   e) Fermi&#45;Dirac statistics&lt;br /&gt;
Nobody knows.&lt;br /&gt;
=.&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell&#8217;s equations:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#8220;One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae&lt;br /&gt;
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,&lt;br /&gt;
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,&lt;br /&gt;
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them.&#8221; &lt;br /&gt;
==.&lt;br /&gt;
Ladies and Gentlemen !&lt;br /&gt;
Friends ! &lt;br /&gt;
Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we are.&lt;br /&gt;
==========.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel Sadovnik  Socratus&lt;br /&gt;
========.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-10-12T07:56:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The 2011 Nobel Prize for Physics for the discovery that</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1002/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1002/#When:05:33:05Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
 The 2011 Nobel Prize for Physics for the discovery that&lt;br /&gt;
 the rate of expansion of the universe  is increasing&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
What was before: egg or chicken?&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, I know this question is very old and does not have answer.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore I will ask a simpler question:&lt;br /&gt;
 What was before: ‘ big bang’ or vacuum?&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
Nobody knows the reason of ‘ big bang’. My opinion:&lt;br /&gt;
The action when the God  compressed the whole Universe into&lt;br /&gt;
 his palm, the scientists named ‘singular point’ &lt;br /&gt;
And the action when  the God  opened his palm  the scientists &lt;br /&gt;
named ‘Big Bang’&lt;br /&gt;
Does evolution begin on big bang level ?&lt;br /&gt;
At what step does consciousness begin? &lt;br /&gt;
Does consciousness begin on big bang level ?&lt;br /&gt;
=.&lt;br /&gt;
What is our intellect ?&lt;br /&gt;
We can see this practically :&lt;br /&gt;
after ‘ big bang‘ all Galaxies run away from us&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
Dark Energy may be Vacuum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusfusion.org/index.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurekalert.org%2Fpub_releases%2F2007&#45;01%2Fuoc&#45;dem011607.php&quot;&gt;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007&#45;01/uoc&#45;dem011607.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel Sadovnik Socratus&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-10-09T05:33:05+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>&#45;&amp;nbsp; Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/978/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/978/#When:07:53:53Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&#45;&amp;nbsp; Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
In beginning was Vacuum an Infinite / Eternal continuum.&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
Vacuum is not Empty space. &lt;br /&gt;
‘ Virtual particles’, ‘ dark matter’ and ‘zoo of elementary particles’&lt;br /&gt;
exist in the Vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
Now (!) the physicists think (!) that the Universe as whole has&lt;br /&gt;
 temperature: T= 2,7K .&amp;nbsp; The parameter T=2,7K is not constant.&lt;br /&gt;
 It is temporal and goes down. In the future it will come to T= 0K.&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
The simplest question: Which geometrical form can have &lt;br /&gt;
the ‘ virtual particles’, ‘ the particles of dark matter’ , &lt;br /&gt;
the  ‘ zoo of elementary particles’&amp;nbsp; in reference frame&lt;br /&gt;
 T= 2,7K &#45; –&#8212;&amp;gt; T= 0K ?&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is: ‘ They must be flat particles.’ &lt;br /&gt;
Why?&lt;br /&gt;
Because according to Charle’s law and the consequence of the&lt;br /&gt;
 third law of thermodynamics as the thermodynamic temperature &lt;br /&gt;
of a system approaches absolute zero the volume of particles &lt;br /&gt;
approaches zero too. It means the particles must have flat forms.&lt;br /&gt;
They must have geometrical form of a circle: pi= c /d =3,14 . . . . .&lt;br /&gt;
====.&lt;br /&gt;
Best wishes. &lt;br /&gt;
Israel Sadovnik.&amp;nbsp; Socratus. &lt;br /&gt;
========================…&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-08-30T07:53:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>&#8216;God particle&#8217; out of hiding places: CERN chief</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/976/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/976/#When:08:55:16Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&#8216;God particle&#8217; out of hiding places: CERN chief&lt;br /&gt;
August 25th, 2011 in Physics / General Physics &lt;br /&gt;
Enlarge &lt;br /&gt;
The director general of the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), Rolf&#45;Dieter Heuer, addresses a news conference at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) in Mumbai on August 25. Heuer said the the elusive Higgs Boson, known as the &#8220;God particle&#8221;, was&#8212;if it exists&#8212;running out of places to hide.&lt;br /&gt;
The elusive Higgs Boson, known as the &#8220;God particle&#8221;, is&#8212;if it exists&#8212;running out of places to hide, the head of the mammoth experiment designed to find it said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;The window for the famous Higgs Boson&#8230; is getting smaller and smaller,&#8221; Professor Rolf Heuer, director&#45;general of the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), told a news conference in Mumbai, where the agency presented its latest data in the quest.&lt;br /&gt;
The Higgs Boson is a theoretical sub&#45;atomic particle that is believed to confer mass. It is named after a British scientist who suggested its existence in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
It has been dubbed the &#8220;God particle&#8221; because it is thought to be everywhere, but it has also proved agonisingly hard to find.&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists at CERN are trying to determine its existence in the world&#8217;s largest particle collider, located in a tunnel deep below the Franco&#45;Swiss border, and believe they can come up with an answer by the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
Heuer said the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was working well but finding evidence of the enigmatic particle was difficult because they were looking at the lowest levels of mass, the last place where it may&#8212;or may not&#8212;lurk.&lt;br /&gt;
He likened the search to trying to find a snowy field during a blizzard, while Pier Oddone, director of the US Department of Energy&#8217;s Fermilab, said it was like looking for stars in daylight.&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;It&#8217;s the hardest region because of the background&#8230; It&#8217;s more difficult to see what&#8217;s going on,&#8221; Oddone said.&lt;br /&gt;
On Monday, CERN research director Sergio Bertolucci said experiments had excluded with 95 percent certainty the existence of the Higgs boson at higher levels of mass.&lt;br /&gt;
The 27&#45;kilometre (16.9&#45;mile) Large Hadron Collider is designed to accelerate protons to nearly the speed of light and then smash them together where detectors in house&#45;sized laboratories record the seething, sub&#45;atomic debris.&lt;br /&gt;
The collisions briefly create temperatures 100,000 times hotter than the Sun, fleetingly replicating conditions split&#45;seconds after the &#8220;Big Bang&#8221; that created the known universe 13.7 billion years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
The Higgs Boson is the missing cornerstone of the well&#45;tested Standard Model of particle physics, a theory which explains how known sub&#45;atomic particles in the universe interact.&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Rohini Godbole, particle theorist at the Centre for High Energy Physics at the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore, said the Standard Model had been put together like a house of cards over the last 70 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;We&#8217;re trying to put together the last two cards,&#8221; she added. &#8220;If the Higgs Boson is found, the two cards meet. If it&#8217;s not&#8230; the house of cards is going to fall down.&#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
Godbole said she was confident of a discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;All that so far has been tested, whatever we have been predicting, has been found to be true,&#8221; she said.&lt;br /&gt;
(c) 2011 AFP&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;&#8216;God particle&#8217; out of hiding places: CERN chief.&#8221; &lt;br /&gt;
August 25th, 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusfusion.org/index.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.physorg.com%2Fnews%2F2011&#45;08&#45;god&#45;particle&#45;cern&#45;chief.html&quot;&gt;http://www.physorg.com/news/2011&#45;08&#45;god&#45;particle&#45;cern&#45;chief.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Karl Stonjek&lt;br /&gt;
===========.&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
God particle may not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;  Thursday, 6 December, 2001, 13:13 GMT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusfusion.org/index.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F2%2Fhi%2Fscience%2Fnature%2F1695390.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1695390.stm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp;   &#45; The mad CERN’s way.&lt;br /&gt;
14 Sep 2008 16:14 GMT  &lt;br /&gt;
by  Israel  Sadovnik  Socratus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusfusion.org/index.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spacekb.com%2FUwe%2FForum.aspx%2Fastronomy%2F13338%2FThe&#45;mad&#45;CERN&#45;s&#45;project&quot;&gt;http://www.spacekb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/astronomy/13338/The&#45;mad&#45;CERN&#45;s&#45;project&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====..&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-08-26T08:55:16+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ignore this post</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/974/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/974/#When:19:58:54Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Just testing something.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Great!&amp;nbsp; That worked!&amp;nbsp; Posts in this forum don&#8217;t show up on the home page with the other forum posts.&amp;nbsp; This is truly the Siberia of our forums.]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2011-08-25T19:58:54+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>About creators of God</title>
      <link>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/959/</link>
      <guid>http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/959/#When:06:24:58Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;About creators of God &lt;br /&gt;
# &lt;br /&gt;
Everybody creates his God according to his own image and spirit &lt;br /&gt;
If triangles made a God they would give him three sides&lt;br /&gt;
/ Charles de Montesquieu . Persian Letters, 1721 /&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
If physicists made a God they would give him &lt;br /&gt;
concrete physical parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
Which parameters they can be ?&lt;br /&gt;
We know that God is something Infinite. &lt;br /&gt;
What is ‘INFINITY’ ? Nobody knows.&lt;br /&gt;
The conception of ‘ Infinity’ we can find not only in Bible&lt;br /&gt;
 but in Physics too.&amp;nbsp; Are they equal ?&lt;br /&gt;
I think that ‘INFINITY’ is ‘INFINITY’ and can be only one&lt;br /&gt;
 for every knowledge, for every meaning. &lt;br /&gt;
I think there isn’t special  ‘INFINITY’ for Bible and special&lt;br /&gt;
 ‘INFINITY’ for Physics. I think the conception ‘INFINITY’&lt;br /&gt;
 is equal for every part of Science.&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
Again and again the ‘INFINITY’ appears in many physical&lt;br /&gt;
 and mathematical problems.&lt;br /&gt;
/ Part  Physics:&amp;nbsp; Theoretical applications of physical infinity .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://focusfusion.org/index.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FInfinity&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;  /&lt;br /&gt;
It means that ‘INFINITY’&amp;nbsp; is some kind of reality. (!)&lt;br /&gt;
Does Physicists meet God In the Infinite ? &lt;br /&gt;
(!)&lt;br /&gt;
To understand this we need to find the answers to the questions:&lt;br /&gt;
1) What is / are the physical parameters of the ‘INFINITY’ ?&lt;br /&gt;
2) What is connection between the infinity and the concreteness ?&lt;br /&gt;
3) What is connection between infinity and quality ?&lt;br /&gt;
4) How to explain the unity and inconsistent character between &lt;br /&gt;
the infinity and the concreteness ? &lt;br /&gt;
===============.&lt;br /&gt;
Best wishes.&lt;br /&gt;
 Israel Sadovnik Socratus &lt;br /&gt;
=====================.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <dc:date>2011-08-19T06:24:58+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
